{"id":8806,"date":"2024-08-31T15:33:03","date_gmt":"2024-08-31T19:33:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/?p=8806"},"modified":"2024-08-31T15:33:03","modified_gmt":"2024-08-31T19:33:03","slug":"brazil-blocks-musks-x-after-company-refuses-to-name-local-representative-amid-feud-with-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/?p=8806","title":{"rendered":"Brazil Blocks Musk\u2019s X After Company Refuses to Name Local Representative Amid Feud with Judge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/cdndailyexcelsior.b-cdn.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/TWITTER.jpg\" width=\"1565\" height=\"854\"><\/p>\n<p>Brazil started blocking Elon Musk\u2019s social media platform X early Saturday, making it largely inaccessible on both the web and through its mobile app after the company&nbsp;<span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/brazil-x-elon-musk-shutdown-moraes-supreme-court-twitter-70fdaeef282e1ac7d649b99cf8241b42\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\">refused to comply with a judge\u2019s<\/a><\/span>&nbsp;order.<\/p>\n<p>X missed a deadline imposed by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes to name a legal representative in Brazil, triggering the suspension. It marks an&nbsp;<span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/brazil-musk-x-twitter-moraes-bef06c0dbbb8ed87495b1afbb0edf211\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\">escalation in the monthslong feud<\/a><\/span>&nbsp;between Musk and de Moraes over free speech, far-right accounts and misinformation.<\/p>\n<p>To block X, Brazil\u2019s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, told internet service providers to suspend users\u2019 access to the social media platform. As of Saturday at midnight local time, major operators began doing so.<\/p>\n<p>De Moraes had warned Musk on Wednesday night that X could be blocked in Brazil if he failed to comply with his order to name a representative, and established a 24-hour deadline. The company hasn\u2019t had a representative in the country since earlier this month.<\/p>\n<div class=\"SovrnAd Advertisement sovrn-story-feed proper-dynamic-insertion\" data-module=\"\" data-class=\"sovrn-story-feed\" data-delayadinsertion=\"\" data-ad-position=\"2\">\u201cElon Musk showed his total disrespect for Brazilian sovereignty and, in particular, for the judiciary, setting himself up as a true supranational entity and immune to the laws of each country,\u201d de Moraes wrote in his decision on Friday.<\/div>\n<div data-module=\"\" data-class=\"sovrn-story-feed\" data-delayadinsertion=\"\" data-ad-position=\"2\">\n<p>The justice said the platform will stay suspended until it complies with his orders, and also set a daily fine of 50,000 reais ($8,900) for people or companies using VPNs to access it.<\/p>\n<p>In a later ruling, he backtracked on his initial decision to establish a 5-day deadline for internet service providers themselves \u2014 and not just the telecommunications regulator \u2014 to block access to X, as well as his directive for app stores to remove virtual private networks, or VPNs.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute also led to the freezing this week of the bank accounts in Brazil of Musk\u2019s satellite internet provider Starlink.<\/p>\n<p>Brazil is one of the biggest markets for X, which has struggled with the&nbsp;<span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/x-sues-advertisers-unilever-cvs-mars-orsted-673d1ae88e9fb0ca5b170d238739453e\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\">loss of advertisers<\/a><\/span>&nbsp;since Musk purchased the former Twitter in 2022. Market research group Emarketer says some 40 million Brazilians, roughly one-fifth of the population, access X at least once per month.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a sad day for X users around the world, especially those in Brazil, who are being denied access to our platform. I wish it did not have to come to this \u2013 it breaks my heart,\u201d X\u2019s CEO Linda Yaccarino said Friday night, adding that Brazil is failing to uphold its constitution\u2019s pledge to forbid censorship.<\/p>\n<p>X had posted on its official Global Government Affairs page late Thursday that it expected X to be shut down by de Moraes, \u201csimply because we would not comply with his illegal orders to censor his political opponents.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen we attempted to defend ourselves in court, Judge de Moraes threatened our Brazilian legal representative with imprisonment. Even after she resigned, he froze all of her bank accounts,\u201d the company wrote.<\/p>\n<p>X has clashed with de Moraes over its reluctance to comply with orders to block users.<\/p>\n<p>Accounts that the platform previously has shut down on Brazilian orders include lawmakers affiliated with former President Jair Bolsonaro\u2019s right-wing party and activists accused of undermining Brazilian democracy. X\u2019s lawyers in April sent a document to the Supreme Court in April, saying that since 2019 it had suspended or blocked 226 users.<\/p>\n<p>In his decision Friday, de Moraes\u2019 cited Musk\u2019s statements as evidence that X\u2019s conduct \u201cclearly intends to continue to encourage posts with extremism, hate speech and anti-democratic discourse, and to try to withdraw them from jurisdictional control.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In April,&nbsp;<span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/brazil-musk-x-supreme-court-investigation-a645757b95a66ee658832802908466ab\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\">de Moraes included Musk as a target<\/a><\/span>&nbsp;in an ongoing investigation over the dissemination of fake news and opened a separate investigation into the executive for alleged obstruction.<\/p>\n<p>Musk, a self-proclaimed \u201cfree speech absolutist,\u201d has repeatedly claimed the justice\u2019s actions amount to censorship, and his argument has been echoed by Brazil\u2019s political right. He has often insulted de Moraes on his platform, characterizing him as a dictator and tyrant.<\/p>\n<p>De Moraes\u2019 defenders have said his actions aimed at X have been lawful, supported by most of the court\u2019s full bench and have served to protect democracy at a time it is imperiled. He wrote Friday that his ruling is based on Brazilian law requiring internet services companies to have representation in the country so they can be notified when there are relevant court decisions and take requisite action \u2014 specifying the takedown of illicit content posted by users, and an anticipated churn of misinformation during October municipal elections.<\/p>\n<p>The looming shutdown is not unprecedented in Brazil.<\/p>\n<p>Lone Brazilian judges shut down Meta\u2019s WhatsApp, the nation\u2019s most widely used messaging app, several times in 2015 and 2016 due to the company\u2019s refusal to comply with police requests for user data. In 2022, de Moraes threatened the messaging app Telegram with a nationwide shutdown, arguing it had repeatedly ignored Brazilian authorities\u2019 requests to block profiles and provide information. He ordered Telegram to appoint a local representative; the company ultimately complied and stayed online.<\/p>\n<p>X and its former incarnation, Twitter, have been banned in several countries \u2014 mostly authoritarian regimes such as Russia, China, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Venezuela and Turkmenistan. Other countries, such as&nbsp;<span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/pakistan-x-twitter-disruption-1f782388be6445de8e592ba1c71d045a\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\">Pakistan<\/a><\/span>, Turkey and Egypt, have also temporarily suspended X before, usually to quell dissent and unrest. Twitter was banned in Egypt after the Arab Spring uprisings, which some dubbed the \u201cTwitter revolution,\u201d but it has since been restored.<\/p>\n<p>A search Friday on X showed hundreds of Brazilian users inquiring about VPNs that could potentially enable them to continue using the platform by making it appear they were logging on from outside the country. It was not immediately clear how Brazilian authorities would police this practice and impose fines cited by de Moraes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is an unusual measure, but its main objective is to ensure that the court order to suspend the platform\u2019s operation is, in fact, effective,\u201d Filipe Medon, a specialist in digital law and professor at the law school of Getulio Vargas Foundation, a university in Rio de Janeiro, told The Associated Press.<\/p>\n<p>Mariana de Souza Alves Lima, known by her handle MariMoon, showed her 1.4 million followers on X where she intends to go, posting a screenshot of rival social network BlueSky.<\/p>\n<p>On Thursday evening, Starlink, said on X that de Moraes this week froze its finances, preventing it from doing any transactions in the country where it has more than 250,000 customers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis order is based on an unfounded determination that Starlink should be responsible for the fines levied\u2014unconstitutionally\u2014against X. It was issued in secret and without affording Starlink any of the due process of law guaranteed by the Constitution of Brazil. We intend to address the matter legally,\u201d Starlink said in its statement. The law firm representing Starlink told the AP that the company appealed, but wouldn\u2019t make further comment.<\/p>\n<p>Musk replied to people sharing the reports of the freeze, adding insults directed at de Moraes. \u201cThis guy @Alexandre is an outright criminal of the worst kind, masquerading as a judge,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Musk later posted on X that SpaceX, which runs Starlink, will provide free internet service in Brazil \u201cuntil the matter is resolved\u201d since \u201cwe cannot receive payment, but don\u2019t want to cut anyone off.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In his decision, de Moraes said he ordered the freezing of Starlink\u2019s assets, as X didn\u2019t have enough money in its accounts to cover mounting fines, and reasoning that the two companies are part of the same economic group.<\/p>\n<p>While ordering X\u2019s suspension followed warnings and fines and so was appropriate, taking action against Starlink seems \u201chighly questionable,\u201d said Luca Belli, coordinator of the Getulio Vargas Foundation\u2019s Technology and Society Center.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes, of course, they have the same owner, Elon Musk, but it is discretionary to consider Starlink as part of the same economic group as Twitter (X). They have no connection, they have no integration,\u201d Belli said.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8211; Gabriela S\u00e1 Pessoa and Mauricio Savarese, AP News<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brazil started blocking Elon Musk\u2019s social media platform X early Saturday, making it largely inaccessible on both the web and through its mobile app after the company&nbsp;refused to comply with a judge\u2019s&nbsp;order. X missed a deadline imposed by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes to name a legal representative in Brazil, triggering the suspension. It&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":124,"featured_media":8807,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cdndailyexcelsior.b-cdn.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/TWITTER.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Brazil Blocks Musk\u2019s X After Company Refuses to Name Local Representative Amid Feud with Judge","footnotes":""},"categories":[192],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-polity-governance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/124"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8806"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8806\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8808,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8806\/revisions\/8808"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}