{"id":8765,"date":"2024-08-22T12:11:09","date_gmt":"2024-08-22T16:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/?p=8765"},"modified":"2024-08-22T12:11:09","modified_gmt":"2024-08-22T16:11:09","slug":"mexico-to-bring-charges-against-el-chapos-son-not-for-drugs-but-for-turning-over-another-drug-lord-to-u-s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/?p=8765","title":{"rendered":"Mexico to Bring Charges Against El Chapo’s Son, Not for Drugs, but for Turning Over Another Drug Lord to U.S."},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

The strange saga of how two Mexican drug lords were detained after landing in a plane in the United States in July just got stranger.<\/p>\n

The Mexican government now says it is bringing charges against Joaqu\u00edn Guzm\u00e1n L\u00f3pez, but not because he was a leader of the Sinaloa drug cartel founded by his father, Joaqu\u00edn \u201cEl Chapo\u201d Guzm\u00e1n.<\/p>\n

Instead, Mexican prosecutors are bringing charges against the younger Guzm\u00e1n for apparently kidnapping Ismael \u201cEl Mayo\u201d Zambada<\/a><\/span> \u2014 an older drug boss from a rival faction of the cartel \u2014 forcing him onto the plane and flying to an airport near El Paso, Texas.<\/p>\n

The younger Guzm\u00e1n apparently intended to turn himself in to U.S. authorities, but may have brought Zambada along as a prize to sweeten any plea deal.<\/p>\n

Federal prosecutors issued a statement saying \u201can arrest warrant has been prepared\u201d against the younger Guzm\u00e1n for kidnapping.<\/p>\n

But it also cited another charge under an article of Mexico\u2019s criminal code that defines what he did as treason<\/a><\/span>. That section of the law says treason is committed \u201cby those who illegally abduct a person in Mexico in order to hand them over to authorities of another country.\u201d<\/p>\n

That clause was apparently motivated by the abduction of a Mexican doctor wanted for allegedly participating in the 1985 torture and killing of Drug Enforcement Administration agent Kiki Camarena.<\/p>\n

Nowhere in the statement does it mention that the younger Guzm\u00e1n was a member of the \u201clittle Chapos\u201d faction of the Sinaloa cartel,<\/a><\/span> made up of Chapo\u2019s sons, that smuggles millions of doses of the deadly opioid fentanyl into the United States, causing about 70,000 overdose deaths each year.<\/p>\n

The federal prosecutors\u2019 statement also included an unusually harsh and revealing description about evidence presented by prosecutors in the northern state of Sinaloa that has since proved to be false.<\/p>\n

Sinaloa state prosecutors were apparently trying to distance the state\u2019s governor, Rub\u00e9n Rocha, from the killing of a local political rival, Hector Cu\u00e9n, who was at a meeting that was used as a pretext for luring Zambada to the abduction site. Zambada has said he expected the governor to be at that meeting; Rocha has said he made a trip out of the state that day.<\/p>\n

\n

To play down reports of the purported meeting, state prosecutors published a video of an apparent shooting during what they claimed was a botched robbery at a local gas station. They said Cu\u00e9n was killed there, not at the meeting site, where Zambada said Cu\u00e9n was murdered.<\/p>\n

While federal prosecutors stopped short of saying the gas station video was a fake, they earlier noted that the number of gunshots heard on the video didn\u2019t match the number of gunshot wounds on Cu\u00e9n\u2019s body.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, the federal prosecutors went further, saying the video \u201cis unacceptable, nor does it have sufficient value as evidence to be taken into account.\u201d<\/p>\n

Zambada has said that Guzm\u00e1n, who he trusted, had invited him to the meeting to help iron out the fierce political rivalry between Cu\u00e9n and Rocha. Zambada was known for eluding capture for decades because of his incredibly tight, loyal and sophisticated personal security apparatus.<\/p>\n

The fact that he would knowingly leave that all behind to meet with Rocha means that Zambada viewed such a meeting as credible and feasible. The same goes for the idea that Zambada, as the leader of the oldest wing of the Sinaloa cartel, could act as an arbiter in the state\u2019s political disputes.<\/p>\n

The governor has denied he knew of or attended the meeting where Zambada was abducted.<\/p>\n

The whole case has been an embarrassment for the Mexican government, which didn\u2019t even know about the detentions of the two drug lords on U.S. soil until after the fact.<\/p>\n

President Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador has long viewed any U.S. intervention as an affront, and has refused to confront Mexico\u2019s drug cartels<\/a><\/span>. He recently questioned the U.S. policy of detaining drug cartel leaders, asking, \u201cWhy don\u2019t they change that policy?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The strange saga of how two Mexican drug lords were detained after landing in a plane in the United States in July just got stranger. The Mexican government now says it is bringing charges against Joaqu\u00edn Guzm\u00e1n L\u00f3pez, but not because he was a leader of the Sinaloa drug cartel founded by his father, Joaqu\u00edn…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":124,"featured_media":8766,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.pacozea.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Joaquin-Guzman.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"Mexico to Bring Charges Against Capo, Not for Drugs, but for Turning Over Another Drug Lord to U.S.","footnotes":""},"categories":[192],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-polity-governance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/124"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8765"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8765\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8767,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8765\/revisions\/8767"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinamericasecurityreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}